The CES Letter is a document that has sparked significant discussion and debate within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS). Written by Jeremy Runnells, a former member of the church, the letter addresses various doctrinal, historical, and theological issues that Runnells encountered as he sought answers to his questions about the faith. The CES Letter has had a profound impact on many who read it, both inside and outside the LDS Church, as it presents a series of challenges to the traditional narrative taught by the church.
Origins of the CES Letter
The CES Letter was originally written in 2013 as a personal letter to a church leader in the Church Educational System (CES), hence its name. Runnells was struggling with doubts and sought guidance from the CES, hoping to find clear and satisfying answers to his concerns about church history, doctrine, and teachings. Instead of receiving answers that eased his doubts, Runnells decided to compile his questions and concerns into a comprehensive document, which he shared publicly. The letter quickly gained traction, becoming a central point of discussion for those questioning their faith and others interested in Mormon history.
Key Issues Raised in the CES Letter
One of the reasons the CES Letter has resonated with so many people is the breadth of issues it addresses. Runnells tackles topics ranging from early church history to discrepancies in official teachings. Some of the most notable issues include:
- The Book of Mormon: The CES Letter raises concerns about the historical accuracy of the Book of Mormon and questions its origins, including Joseph Smith’s method of translation and the use of seer stones.
- Polygamy: The letter delves into the church’s practice of polygamy in the 19th century, especially Joseph Smith’s involvement and the church’s subsequent portrayal of these events.
- The First Vision: Runnells questions the differing accounts of Joseph Smith’s First Vision, which is foundational to Mormon theology. The inconsistencies between these accounts have been a major point of discussion among church historians and critics alike.
- Racism and the Priesthood Ban:Another important topic addressed in the CES Letter is the church’s historical ban on Black men holding the priesthood, which lasted until 1978. Runnells highlights the lack of a clear explanation from church leadership regarding the origins and justification of this policy.
Each of these topics, along with many others addressed in the letter, has led readers to reevaluate their understanding of Mormonism’s history and teachings.
Responses to the CES Letter
The CES Letter has prompted various responses from church members, leaders and scholars. For some, reading the letter has been a catalyst for stepping away from the faith, while others have used it as an opportunity to explore their beliefs more deeply and seek answers to difficult questions.
The church itself has not issued an official response to the CES Letter, but many church apologists and scholars have taken it upon themselves to address the concerns raised. These responses typically aim to provide context to the issues Runnells discusses, offering alternate interpretations of the historical events and doctrinal points he highlights.
For example, defenders of the church’s historical narrative have pointed out that multiple accounts of Joseph Smith’s First Vision are not uncommon for such a significant spiritual event and that the discrepancies can be explained by the evolving context in which they were shared. Similarly, regarding the translation of the Book of Mormon, apologists argue that the use of seer stones and other translation methods fit within the broader tradition of revelation and divine guidance in religious history.
While these responses have satisfied some readers, others remain skeptical, feeling that the issues raised by the CES Letter are too significant to be easily dismissed.
The Broader Impact of the CES Letter
The CES Letter has had a lasting impact on discussions surrounding Mormonism. It has become a common reference point for those experiencing a faith crisis and it has also led to the creation of support communities for those questioning or leaving the LDS Church. These communities provide a space for individuals to share their experiences, ask questions, and explore their beliefs in a non-judgmental environment.
For many, the CES Letter represents a turning point in their spiritual journey. It has encouraged readers to seek out additional sources of information about the church’s history and doctrines, often leading to further questioning and, in some cases, a departure from the faith.
However, it is important to note that the CES Letter does not represent the experience of all church members. While it has undoubtedly influenced many, others remain committed to the faith despite the challenges it presents. For these individuals, the issues raised in the letter serve as opportunities for personal growth and deeper understanding rather than reasons to abandon their beliefs.The CES Letter has become a significant document in discussions about Mormonism, raising questions that have caused many to reflect on their faith. Whether one sees the letter as a challenge to be overcome or as a catalyst for change, its influence on the LDS Church cannot be denied. As the church continues to grow and evolve, the conversations sparked by the CES Letter will likely remain a part of the broader dialogue about faith, history, and belief within Mormonism.